Difference between revisions of "Style Pros and Cons/Notepad"
From Dreamwidth Notes
Foxfirefey (Talk | contribs) (pro and con style) |
Foxfirefey (Talk | contribs) m (S2 and Journal Styles/Notepad moved to Style Pros and Cons/Notepad) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Pros == | == Pros == | ||
+ | * It looks kind of cool, doesn't it? | ||
+ | : No. | ||
== Cons == | == Cons == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Exceedingly uncustomizable -- it's essentially a one-trick pony, and any other designs, etc, look like hammered dogshit. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * That blue background behind the notepad. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * it looks like somebody mated a GeoCities page with HTML email stationery from 1998. | ||
[[Category: Styles Pros and Cons|Notepad]] | [[Category: Styles Pros and Cons|Notepad]] |
Latest revision as of 21:47, 30 January 2009
Notepad
Pros
- It looks kind of cool, doesn't it?
- No.
Cons
- Exceedingly uncustomizable -- it's essentially a one-trick pony, and any other designs, etc, look like hammered dogshit.
- That blue background behind the notepad.
- it looks like somebody mated a GeoCities page with HTML email stationery from 1998.