Difference between revisions of "Points brainstorming"
(→Should we offer one denomination level or several?: Establish relative worth with some obvious items to give people a sense of scale.) |
(→What should it be called?: Avoid currency names, some people don't like "points", suggesting "measures") |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Points to be made about themed vs. unthemed. | Points to be made about themed vs. unthemed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should avoid anything that could easily be construed as a real-world currency, whether past or present. | ||
| + | |||
| + | "Points" has negative connotations for some (see mailing list). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Neutral term that avoids excessive themeing or cuteness: "measures"? | ||
== Should we offer one denomination level or several? == | == Should we offer one denomination level or several? == | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 10 January 2009
Sectioned off so that discussion for each of these points can go in separate areas. --Ursamajor 18:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Contents
What do we need to consider?
Things to consider!
How should it work?
With teamwork! I mean ...
What should it be called?
Points to be made about themed vs. unthemed.
Should avoid anything that could easily be construed as a real-world currency, whether past or present.
"Points" has negative connotations for some (see mailing list).
Neutral term that avoids excessive themeing or cuteness: "measures"?
Should we offer one denomination level or several?
Depends on the relative price range of services to be offered?
Recommend establishing a few base values to give people some idea of intended relative worth: e.g., one year's paid account is the base unit with smaller purchases being a fraction thereof, or one extra userpic is the base unit with larger purchases being multiples thereof.
