Difference between revisions of "Community Wishlist"

From Dreamwidth Notes
Jump to: navigation, search
(Community Wishlist: enable anonymous post creations in comms either literally anonymously or via account-masking)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Communities: General ==
 +
 
* http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/881015.html -- enable anonymous '''posting''' in communities. Some types of comms have a particular need/wish for this, others very much do not want it as it has high abuse potential. One counter-suggestion to just have people create sockpuppets to preserve their anonymity was rejected as leading to namesquatting; even if accounts are deleted, people still have to pay for renames. Other counter-suggestion, to enable '''masking''' of a poster's identity, while still associating the post with an account (viewable by the community mods) was regarded more favorably.
 
* http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/881015.html -- enable anonymous '''posting''' in communities. Some types of comms have a particular need/wish for this, others very much do not want it as it has high abuse potential. One counter-suggestion to just have people create sockpuppets to preserve their anonymity was rejected as leading to namesquatting; even if accounts are deleted, people still have to pay for renames. Other counter-suggestion, to enable '''masking''' of a poster's identity, while still associating the post with an account (viewable by the community mods) was regarded more favorably.
  
 
* Posting template for paid comms (suggested by azurelunatic):  Like the suggestions template, but available to paid comms to force everyone but someone with maintainer status to go through a template, and to be able to create a template. People could still abuse it, of course, but the maintainers could make very clear where everything was supposed to go. Only on posting not on edit (meant to be helpful, and not enforce the rule)
 
* Posting template for paid comms (suggested by azurelunatic):  Like the suggestions template, but available to paid comms to force everyone but someone with maintainer status to go through a template, and to be able to create a template. People could still abuse it, of course, but the maintainers could make very clear where everything was supposed to go. Only on posting not on edit (meant to be helpful, and not enforce the rule)
 
** On the other hand, templates could also be optional.  There are different kinds of templates a community might want--intro template, fiction post template, etc, and they might only want to facilitate using them to make it easy, not force every post to use them --[[User:Foxfirefey|Foxfirefey]] 06:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 
** On the other hand, templates could also be optional.  There are different kinds of templates a community might want--intro template, fiction post template, etc, and they might only want to facilitate using them to make it easy, not force every post to use them --[[User:Foxfirefey|Foxfirefey]] 06:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Communities: Community Maintenance/Moderation ==
 +
 +
* http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/883325.html -- Let community maintainers create a boilerplate message unique to their community that will display when someone tries to join their community.
 +
 +
* http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/881865.html -- Expand number of comments viewable in 'Latest Received' area to ease handling of comments in very active communities. Specific number given was 500, broken down in pages of 50.
 +
 +
* http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/376934.html -- Screen entry until fixed by original poster.
 +
 +
* http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/891068.html - "Pending Membership Requests" modification request: be able to bulk approve, reject, and reject+ban from the same page with one click.
 +
 +
* http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/892471.html - Add "notes" section for maints/mods. Could be achieved several ways - additional fields on /manage/banusers.bml (for each displayed user, show: user, date/time of banning; in comms, show who did banning and allow notes field for); allow private posts to comm which would only be visible to maints/mods?
  
 
[[Category: Wishlists]]
 
[[Category: Wishlists]]

Revision as of 03:23, 10 January 2009

Communities: General

  • http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/881015.html -- enable anonymous posting in communities. Some types of comms have a particular need/wish for this, others very much do not want it as it has high abuse potential. One counter-suggestion to just have people create sockpuppets to preserve their anonymity was rejected as leading to namesquatting; even if accounts are deleted, people still have to pay for renames. Other counter-suggestion, to enable masking of a poster's identity, while still associating the post with an account (viewable by the community mods) was regarded more favorably.
  • Posting template for paid comms (suggested by azurelunatic): Like the suggestions template, but available to paid comms to force everyone but someone with maintainer status to go through a template, and to be able to create a template. People could still abuse it, of course, but the maintainers could make very clear where everything was supposed to go. Only on posting not on edit (meant to be helpful, and not enforce the rule)
    • On the other hand, templates could also be optional. There are different kinds of templates a community might want--intro template, fiction post template, etc, and they might only want to facilitate using them to make it easy, not force every post to use them --Foxfirefey 06:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Communities: Community Maintenance/Moderation

  • http://community.livejournal.com/suggestions/892471.html - Add "notes" section for maints/mods. Could be achieved several ways - additional fields on /manage/banusers.bml (for each displayed user, show: user, date/time of banning; in comms, show who did banning and allow notes field for); allow private posts to comm which would only be visible to maints/mods?