Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dev Getting Started"
From Dreamwidth Notes
(use of the Contributing project) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Have listed us at http://contributing.appspot.com/dreamwidth -- if bugzilla, the repository, or the how-to-dev-with-us moves, please poke me and I will happily update. [[User:AzureLunaticDW|AzureLunaticDW]] 12:25, 18 March 2011 (PDT) | Have listed us at http://contributing.appspot.com/dreamwidth -- if bugzilla, the repository, or the how-to-dev-with-us moves, please poke me and I will happily update. [[User:AzureLunaticDW|AzureLunaticDW]] 12:25, 18 March 2011 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I find the article a bit confusing as-is: the workflow section is super useful but more detailed that the 'long section' which is supposed to be about detailing all the steps you need to go through, while still not mentioning all the steps either. So you have a bit there and then another bit over there and it's not very comprehensive either way. I think this needs rewriting to better integrate the two or reorganize things in a different way. Just my 2 cents. --[[User:Ninetydegrees|Ninetydegrees]] ([[User talk:Ninetydegrees|talk]]) 16:25, 4 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * agree, but I haven't quite the brain to fix it. --[[User:Kaberett|Kaberett]] ([[User talk:Kaberett|talk]]) | ||
| + | * should be much better as of now [[User:Afuna|Afuna]] ([[User talk:Afuna|talk]]) 07:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:39, 14 October 2014
Have listed us at http://contributing.appspot.com/dreamwidth -- if bugzilla, the repository, or the how-to-dev-with-us moves, please poke me and I will happily update. AzureLunaticDW 12:25, 18 March 2011 (PDT)
I find the article a bit confusing as-is: the workflow section is super useful but more detailed that the 'long section' which is supposed to be about detailing all the steps you need to go through, while still not mentioning all the steps either. So you have a bit there and then another bit over there and it's not very comprehensive either way. I think this needs rewriting to better integrate the two or reorganize things in a different way. Just my 2 cents. --Ninetydegrees (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
