Difference between revisions of "Proposed URL Changes"
(New page: This page discusses the proposed rearchitecture of the URLs used by the site. == Goal == Modern web software has standardized on using simpler URLs: removing unnecessary cruft, using sim...) |
Foxfirefey (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Modern web software has standardized on using simpler URLs: removing unnecessary cruft, using simple verbs/nouns to define what you're doing, etc. LJ has not kept up with these changes, and we have a good chance with DW to do so. | Modern web software has standardized on using simpler URLs: removing unnecessary cruft, using simple verbs/nouns to define what you're doing, etc. LJ has not kept up with these changes, and we have a good chance with DW to do so. | ||
| − | Note: we will continue to support old-style URLs, so we do not break links and muscle memory. | + | Note: we will continue to support old-style URLs, so we do not break links and muscle memory. We will also keep extensions such as <tt>.jpg</tt> and <tt>.mp3</tt> for content that isn't HTML. However, canonical URLs will be new-style. |
== Journal Space == | == Journal Space == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/edit # edit entry #12? | http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/edit # edit entry #12? | ||
http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/delete # delete entry #12? | http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/delete # delete entry #12? | ||
| + | http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/comment/ # comment on entry #12? | ||
| + | http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/comment/1335/reply # reply to comment 1335 comment on entry #12? | ||
http://USER.dreamwidth.org/comment/1335 # comment 1335 to the account | http://USER.dreamwidth.org/comment/1335 # comment 1335 to the account | ||
http://USER.dreamwidth.org/comment/1335/screen # screen this comment? | http://USER.dreamwidth.org/comment/1335/screen # screen this comment? | ||
Revision as of 23:40, 6 March 2009
This page discusses the proposed rearchitecture of the URLs used by the site.
Goal
Modern web software has standardized on using simpler URLs: removing unnecessary cruft, using simple verbs/nouns to define what you're doing, etc. LJ has not kept up with these changes, and we have a good chance with DW to do so.
Note: we will continue to support old-style URLs, so we do not break links and muscle memory. We will also keep extensions such as .jpg and .mp3 for content that isn't HTML. However, canonical URLs will be new-style.
Journal Space
User content should always be delivered on the subdomain that the user owns. For the purpose of this discussion we will use USER to indicate where the user's account name will be.
Here's a sample of proposed URLs:
http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12 # user's 12th entry http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/edit # edit entry #12? http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/delete # delete entry #12? http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/comment/ # comment on entry #12? http://USER.dreamwidth.org/entry/12/comment/1335/reply # reply to comment 1335 comment on entry #12? http://USER.dreamwidth.org/comment/1335 # comment 1335 to the account http://USER.dreamwidth.org/comment/1335/screen # screen this comment? http://USER.dreamwidth.org/media/133.jpg # some image upload http://USER.dreamwidth.org/media/193.mp3 # voice post http://USER.dreamwidth.org/post # post to this account http://USER.dreamwidth.org/profile # user's profile
Keep in mind that all action URLs - i.e., /delete, /edit, /screen, etc - will present the user with a conformation page. No action will be taken via GET.
However, if we receive a valid POST (i.e., via JavaScript/AJAX) then we can take the action. (This simplifies many, many things.)
Site Space
No examples yet.
